“O sublime generosity of God the Father! O highest and most wonderful felicity of man! To him it was granted to have what he chooses, to be what he wills.”
– Giovanni Pico Della Mirandola, 1486
Pico’s words capture the crux of the Renaissance philosophy of humanism; its focal subject being the dignity of human nature, the greatness of man.
The term ‘La Rinascita’ or ‘rebirth’ was coined by painter and architect Giorgio Vasari in 1550 to describe developments from 14th to 16th century Italy in the visual arts that brought art closer to nature. Later in 1855, Jules Michelet gave the word its French translation – Renaissance – the period which he characterised as one of “the discovery of the world, the discovery of man.” Michelet explained that in the Middle Ages, man was conscious of himself only as a member of a race, people, party, family or corporation. And then during the Italian Renaissance, this veil was lifted into thin air and man became a spiritual individual, and recognized himself as such. Renaissance humanism can thus be understood as a spirit of learning that emphasised humanity with all its capabilities, talents, weaknesses and problems. Man (human form) became the centre of the universe. It brought into the foreground, the ability of human beings to determine truth and false, and to determine their destiny. It also highlighted the belief that human freedom, conscience and sense of rationality are intrinsic to humanity. The main concern of the Renaissance was to define the human place in God’s plan, seeing in human beings the summit and purpose of God’s creation. Therefore, the philosophers, artists and logicians of the age centred all their thought on the “human” relation to the divine, and hence called themselves “humanists.”
If we are to consider a “manifesto” of Renaissance humanism, then Giovanni Pico Della Mirandola’s ‘Oration on the Dignity of Man’ (1486) is it. No other work more meticulously and eloquently enforces the Hellenic ideas of human accomplishment and supremacy in the universe. Pico bases his understanding of, and regard for the greatness of human beings on philosophical texts of different cultures, including those of the Greeks, Arabs, Egyptians, and European Catholics. In his oration, he says, “I have read in the ancient writings of the Arabians that Abdala the Saracen on being asked what, on this stage, so to say, of the world, seemed to him most evocative of wonder, replied that there was nothing to be seen more marvelous than man.” According to Pico, man’s greatness does not lie in the fact that he is the “intermediary between creatures”, having intimate connections with Angels and presiding like a king over the beasts, plants and lower creatures. Man’s place in the Great Chain of Being does claim high admiration, but it cannot be said to be his highest dignity. Rather, it is his knowledge, free will, and power to choose his way of life that makes him the most magnificent creature.
Pico posits that after the omniscient and omnipotent God had created the universe, adorned the heavens with angels, populated the Earth with beasts, filled the nether world with infernal creatures, and animated the celestial spheres, he longed for someone with the intelligence and expertise to appreciate his grand work. It was then that he began considering the creation of Man. God created Man by endowing him with the elements of all other creatures, since he had no other archetype to model him upon. Man, the microcosm having a body mixed of elements, united all three spheres. He had a vegetal soul, the senses of a brute, and the reason, spirit and intellect of angels. He was thus, the very image and essence of God.
Pico’s claim was that man could think for himself and choose his own fate – a liberty granted to no other being. He could choose to descend to the level of beasts by performing bad deeds and transgressing his limits, or he could choose to ascend toward the heavens and thrive among angelic beings by being righteous and moral. All other creatures had natures predefined by God. Animals’ natures were purely instinctive, and their intelligence was only limited to an understanding of their basic needs for survival. Angels were predestined to be principled, moral and sinless. Man on the other hand was born not knowing what he’ll become. When God created Adam and Eve and placed them in the Garden of Eden, he gave them the ability to think for themselves. Their act of consuming the Forbidden Fruit was a deliberate transgression of limit which damned all of mankind to mortality and a postlapsarian world. According to Pico, what God said to Man at the time of creation was this – “Neither an established place, nor a form belonging to you alone, nor any special function have We given to you, O Adam, and for this reason, that you may have and possess, according to your desire and judgement, whatever place, whatever form, and whatever functions you shall desire. You, who are confined by no limits, shall determine for yourself your own nature, in accordance with your own free will, in whose hand I have placed you.” For Pico the Earth is the centre of the universe: and around it, as a fixed and motionless point, the sun and moon and stars revolve, like diligent servants or ministers. And in the midst of all is placed man, nodus et vinculum mundi, the bond or copula of the world, and the “interpreter of nature”: that famous expression of Bacon’s really belongs to Pico.
As aforementioned, Pico drew inspiration from the beliefs of other cultures, particularly those of the Ancient Greeks, and interweaved them with Christianity to arrive at his own statements. This attempt to find a true method of effecting a scientific reconciliation of Christian sentiment with the imagery, the legends, the theories about the world, of pagan poetry and philosophy was typical of the Renaissance. It could only result from the efforts of artists, trained in Christian schools, to handle pagan subjects. Pico, in the full tide of the Renaissance, grappled with the gigantic task of reconciling Catholic doctrine with Aristotle, Plato, the Neo-Platonists, Neo-Pythagoreans, the pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, the Orphic and Hermetic theosophies, and other theologies that the Pagan world had given birth to. According to Plato, man is not an animal though he is born in the same manner. Man had a soul which is a part of the Divine Soul. This helped him to know the eternal laws and the secrets of the universe. He said that man’s body or matter tries to subjugate his divine soul and attracts him towards itself. Man should seek to control it and rise above matter or body to reason. Plato’s disciple Aristotle further said that man is an animal but one who speaks and understands and is also perceptive and intelligent. This is the real difference between man and other creatures. The more significant of his sayings is that man is blessed with a divine spark and this very spark is the soul of buoyancy in man. Pico incorporated both these teachings in his oration and thus lent his efforts to the initiation of secular thought in the Renaissance.
Pico’s work booms of humanist ideals and the secular teachings of the Renaissance age. And so, a new sort of mythology, with a tone and qualities of its own was created. As literary critic Walter Pater writes in his essay ‘Pico Della Mirandola’, “When the ship-load of sacred earth from the soil of Jerusalem was mingled with the common clay in the Campo Santo at Pisa, a new flower grew up from it, unlike any flower men had seen before, the anemone with its concentric rings of strangely blended colour, still to be found by those who search long enough for it, in the long grass of the Maremma. Just such a strange flower was that mythology of the Italian Renaissance, which grew up from the mixture of two traditions, two sentiments, the sacred and the profane.” In conclusion, we can assert that Pico has a true place in that group of great Italians who fill the end of the fifteenth century with their names. He was a true HUMANIST.
Oration on the Dignity of Man: Analysis Essay
731 WordsFeb 21st, 20123 Pages
Oration on the Dignity of Man: Analysis
Pico della Mirandola in his work, “Oration on the Dignity of Man”, re-evaluates humanism and humans in general. His work talks about the dignity of man in particular and how man differs from other creatures as man is a creation with a unique and important trait, free will. He uses several arguments to support his claim that humans can choose their destiny and in doing so can achieve perfection. He presents a piece of work that challenges the medieval view of human nature.
There was a great deal of emphasis on human creative power during the renaissance period. Humanists of the time like Pico, sought to show how man is great and can reach excellence through his own effort, which was a radical change…show more content…
He argues that it is man’s responsibility to use this freedom to search for knowledge and enlightenment in order to get higher. It sounds as if he was saying God would be happier to see man reach perfection and would even admire man for being the creature who works on the creation of God the architect, and bring about changes.
Mankind ability to adapt and change the natural environment, made by God and supposedly unchanging, to suit himself makes him magical. Pico’s great admiration for man is shown in great depth when he stated how difficult it is for anyone not to admire man:
And if, satisfied with no created thing, he removes himself to the center of his own unity, his spiritual soul, united with God, alone in the darkness of God, who is above all things, he will surpass every created thing. Who could not help but admire this great shape-shifter? In fact, how could one admire anything else (Paragraph 4)?
A philosopher himself, Pico uses the word “from heaven” to refer to those philosophers who use their reasoning to see things differently. He uses religious sayings like “You are all angles of the Most High” by Asaph the prophet, for his argument that man can become divine.
The overall emphasis of this work is on humans and human free will. Pico demonstrates the importance of free will. It is because of free will, according to him, that humans can choose their